Tonka-Zucker

by Ruf in Sugars Barcode 40352022
Bad nutritional quality
Processed culinary ingredient
Green-Score
a
Environmental impact estimate

Tonka-Zucker by Ruf provides 394 kcal per 100 g, with 98 g of sugars and 0 g of protein. That is 27% more sugar than the average product in this category. Its Nutri-Score is E and it is classified as NOVA 2 (processed culinary ingredient). It is listed in the Sugars category.

Nutrient levels per 100 g

Fat
0 g · Low
Saturated fat
0 g · Low
Sugars
98 g · High
Salt
0.5 g · Moderate

Levels use UK front-of-pack reference thresholds.

Nutrition facts

Nutrient Per 100 g Category avg
Calories 394 kcal 304 +30%
Total fat 0 g 0.5 −100%
Saturated fat 0 g 0.3 −100%
Carbohydrates 99 g 89.9 +10%
Total sugars 98 g 76.9 +27%
Added sugars 62.5 g 56.4 +11%
Protein 0 g 0.3 −100%
Salt 0.5 g 0.2 +217%

Category average across 2026 Sugars products on Foodmetria.

Compared with other sugars

Calories higher 39%
Sugars lower 41%
Salt higher 3%
Saturated fat lower 1%
Protein top 100%

Bar shows the share of products in this category that contain less of the nutrient.

Ingredients

Zucker, gemahlene Tonkabohnen, Bourbon Vanilleextrakt, Stärke.

Palm oil free

Product details

Sold in
Germany
Barcode
40352022

Prices reported by shoppers

Loading prices…

Frequently asked questions

How many calories are in Tonka-Zucker?

Tonka-Zucker contains 394 kcal per 100 g.

How much sugar is in Tonka-Zucker?

Tonka-Zucker has 98 g of sugars per 100 g, which is considered high by UK front-of-pack guidelines.

Is Tonka-Zucker healthy?

It has a Nutri-Score of E (A is best, E is worst); it is in NOVA group 2 — processed culinary ingredient. Scores describe nutritional quality and processing, not suitability for your individual diet.

Source: Open Food Facts (ODbL). Last updated March 25, 2026. Spotted a mistake? Edit this product on Open Food Facts. Not medical advice — always check the package label.

Reviews

No reviews yet. Tried Tonka-Zucker? Be the first to share how it tastes.

Write a review

Your rating

Reviews are moderated. See our Privacy Policy.

Compare & rankings

Healthier alternatives

Best in category →

Same category, meaningfully better on at least one measure and no worse on the others. Each card shows what improves.

More sugars

View all →

More from Ruf

View all →