View full-size photo · Photo: Open Food Facts contributors, CC BY-SA
Thai jasmine rice
Thai jasmine rice by Members Mark provides 180 kcal per 100 g, with 0 g of sugars and 3 g of protein. That is 100% less sugar than the average product in this category. Its Nutri-Score is B. It is listed in the Rices category.
Nutrient levels per 100 g
Levels use UK front-of-pack reference thresholds.
Nutrition facts
| Nutrient | Per 100 g | Category avg |
|---|---|---|
| Calories | 180 kcal | 329 −45% |
| Total fat | 0 g | 1.4 −100% |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0.3 −100% |
| Carbohydrates | 42 g | 68.5 −39% |
| Total sugars | 0 g | 0.7 −100% |
| Dietary fiber | 0 g | 2.4 −100% |
| Protein | 3 g | 7.2 −58% |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.2 −100% |
*% Daily Value for 100 g, based on a 2,000-calorie diet (FDA reference values). Category average across 2942 Rices products on Foodmetria.
Nutrition claims check
Claims its numbers support
- Sugar-free
- 0 g sugars per 100 g (EU: no more than 0.5 g per 100 g)
- Fat-free
- 0 g fat per 100 g (EU: no more than 0.5 g per 100 g)
- Low saturated fat
- 0 g per 100 g, 0% of calories (EU: no more than 1.5 g per 100 g and 10% of calories)
- Sodium-free
- 0 mg sodium per 100 g (EU: no more than 5 mg per 100 g)
Checked against the per-100 g thresholds of EU Regulation 1924/2006, using the nutrition data above. US labels follow FDA rules, which are mostly based on serving size and can give a different result; FDA has no defined “low sugar” claim.
Compared with other rices
Bar shows the share of products in this category that contain less of the nutrient.
Ingredients
long grain jasmine rice
Product details
- Sold in
- United States
- Barcode
- 0078742184906
Prices reported by shoppers
Loading prices…
Frequently asked questions
How many calories are in Thai jasmine rice?
Thai jasmine rice contains 180 kcal per 100 g.
How much sugar is in Thai jasmine rice?
Thai jasmine rice has 0 g of sugars per 100 g, which is considered low by UK front-of-pack guidelines.
Is Thai jasmine rice healthy?
It has a Nutri-Score of B (A is best, E is worst). Scores describe nutritional quality and processing, not suitability for your individual diet.
Source: Open Food Facts (ODbL). Last updated December 26, 2022. Spotted a mistake? Edit this product on Open Food Facts. Not medical advice — always check the package label.
Reviews
Compare & rankings
Healthier alternatives
Best in category →Same category, meaningfully better on at least one measure and no worse on the others. Each card shows what improves.
a NOVA 1 
b More rices
View all →
c NOVA 4 
b NOVA 4 
c NOVA 4 
b NOVA 3 
b NOVA 1 
b NOVA 1 More from Members Mark
View all →
b NOVA 1 
d NOVA 4 
NOVA 2 
c NOVA 3 
a 
b NOVA 1