Nutrition report ready

Shama chakki gold atta

Calories, Nutri-Score, processing level, additives, ingredients and shopper prices.

Nutri-Score A

View details

Shama chakki gold atta

in Wheat flours Barcode 3760184321533
Very good nutritional quality
Green-Score
a
Environmental impact estimate

Shama chakki gold atta provides 360 kcal per 100 g, with 0 g of sugars and 12 g of protein. That is 100% less sugar than the average product in this category. Its Nutri-Score is A. It is listed in the Wheat flours category.

Nutrient levels per 100 g

Fat
1.7 g · Low
Saturated fat
0 g · Low
Sugars
0 g · Low
Salt
0.1 g · Low

Levels use UK front-of-pack reference thresholds.

Nutrition facts

Nutrient Per 100 g Category avg
Calories 360 kcal 342 +5%
Total fat 1.7 g 1.6 +10%
Saturated fat 0 g 0.3 −100%
Carbohydrates 72.5 g 69.4
Total sugars 0 g 1.6 −100%
Dietary fiber 1.1 g 4.7 −77%
Protein 12 g 11 +9%
Salt 0.1 g 0.2 −72%

Category average across 1023 Wheat flours products on Foodmetria.

Compared with other wheat flours

Calories higher 10%
Sugars lower 1%
Salt higher 24%
Saturated fat lower 1%
Protein top 33%
Fiber top 96%

Bar shows the share of products in this category that contain less of the nutrient.

Product details

Sold in
France
Barcode
3760184321533

Prices reported by shoppers

Loading prices…

Frequently asked questions

How many calories are in Shama chakki gold atta?

Shama chakki gold atta contains 360 kcal per 100 g.

How much sugar is in Shama chakki gold atta?

Shama chakki gold atta has 0 g of sugars per 100 g, which is considered low by UK front-of-pack guidelines.

Is Shama chakki gold atta healthy?

It has a Nutri-Score of A (A is best, E is worst). Scores describe nutritional quality and processing, not suitability for your individual diet.

Source: Open Food Facts (ODbL). Last updated March 25, 2026. Spotted a mistake? Edit this product on Open Food Facts. Not medical advice — always check the package label.

Reviews

No reviews yet. Tried Shama chakki gold atta? Be the first to share how it tastes.

Write a review

Your rating

Reviews are moderated. See our Privacy Policy.

Compare & rankings

Healthier alternatives

Best in category →

Same category, meaningfully better on at least one measure and no worse on the others. Each card shows what improves.

More wheat flours

View all →