View full-size photo · Photo: Open Food Facts contributors, CC BY-SA
Русенско варено
Русенско варено by M eat provides 119 kcal per 100 g, with 0.3 g of sugars and 16.5 g of protein. That is 63% less sugar than the average product in this category. Its Nutri-Score is D and it is classified as NOVA 4 (ultra-processed food). It is listed in the Pork category and comes in a 180 г pack.
Nutrient levels per 100 g
Levels use UK front-of-pack reference thresholds.
Nutrition facts
| Nutrient | Per 100 g | Category avg |
|---|---|---|
| Calories | 119 kcal | 204 −42% |
| Total fat | 4.9 g | 12.7 −62% |
| Saturated fat | 14.9 g | 4.7 +215% |
| Carbohydrates | 2.1 g | 1.8 +15% |
| Total sugars | 0.3 g | 0.8 −63% |
| Protein | 16.5 g | 20.6 −20% |
| Salt | 1.4 g | 1.9 −26% |
*% Daily Value for 100 g, based on a 2,000-calorie diet (FDA reference values). Category average across 2139 Pork products on Foodmetria.
Compared with other pork
Bar shows the share of products in this category that contain less of the nutrient.
Ingredients
Свинско месо - 67,5%, свинска кожа - 7,5%, царевично нишесте, сол, подправки: черен пипер, индийско орехче, консервант: натриев нитрит Е 250, стабилизатор: натриев триполифосфат: E452.
Additives 2
Overexposure risk is based on EFSA evaluations as recorded by Open Food Facts.
Product details
- Quantity
- 180 г
- Sold in
- Bulgaria
- Barcode
- 3800502283072
Prices reported by shoppers
Loading prices…
Frequently asked questions
How many calories are in Русенско варено?
Русенско варено contains 119 kcal per 100 g.
How much sugar is in Русенско варено?
Русенско варено has 0.3 g of sugars per 100 g, which is considered low by UK front-of-pack guidelines.
Is Русенско варено healthy?
It has a Nutri-Score of D (A is best, E is worst); it is in NOVA group 4 — ultra-processed food. Scores describe nutritional quality and processing, not suitability for your individual diet.
Is Русенско варено vegan?
Based on its ingredient list, it is not vegan.
Source: Open Food Facts (ODbL). Last updated July 3, 2024. Spotted a mistake? Edit this product on Open Food Facts. Not medical advice — always check the package label.
Reviews
Compare & rankings
Healthier alternatives
Best in category →Same category, meaningfully better on at least one measure and no worse on the others. Each card shows what improves.
a NOVA 4 
a 
c NOVA 1 
c NOVA 1 More pork
View all →
d NOVA 4 
a NOVA 4 
d NOVA 4 
c 
d NOVA 4 
e NOVA 4 
