Riso lungo B integrale rosso ermes

by Capittini 500 g in Rices Barcode 8032649060109
Good nutritional quality
Green-Score
c
Environmental impact estimate

Riso lungo B integrale rosso ermes by Capittini provides 355 kcal per 100 g, with 0.3 g of sugars and 7 g of protein. That is 58% less sugar than the average product in this category. Its Nutri-Score is B. It is listed in the Rices category and comes in a 500 g pack.

Nutrient levels per 100 g

Fat
1 g · Low
Saturated fat
0.3 g · Low
Sugars
0.3 g · Low
Salt
0 g · Low

Levels use UK front-of-pack reference thresholds.

Nutrition facts

Nutrient Per 100 g Category avg
Calories 355 kcal 329 +8%
Total fat 1 g 1.4 −30%
Saturated fat 0.3 g 0.3 +13%
Carbohydrates 79 g 68.5 +15%
Total sugars 0.3 g 0.7 −58%
Added sugars 0 g 0.2 −100%
Protein 7 g 7.2
Salt 0 g 0.2 −100%

Category average across 2937 Rices products on Foodmetria.

Compared with other rices

Calories higher 41%
Sugars higher 47%
Salt lower 1%
Saturated fat higher 32%
Protein top 52%

Bar shows the share of products in this category that contain less of the nutrient.

Ingredients

RISO LUNGO B INTEGRALE ROSSO ERMES

Product details

Quantity
500 g
Sold in
Italy
Barcode
8032649060109

Prices reported by shoppers

Loading prices…

Frequently asked questions

How many calories are in Riso lungo B integrale rosso ermes?

Riso lungo B integrale rosso ermes contains 355 kcal per 100 g.

How much sugar is in Riso lungo B integrale rosso ermes?

Riso lungo B integrale rosso ermes has 0.3 g of sugars per 100 g, which is considered low by UK front-of-pack guidelines.

Is Riso lungo B integrale rosso ermes healthy?

It has a Nutri-Score of B (A is best, E is worst). Scores describe nutritional quality and processing, not suitability for your individual diet.

Source: Open Food Facts (ODbL). Last updated March 30, 2026. Spotted a mistake? Edit this product on Open Food Facts. Not medical advice — always check the package label.

Reviews

No reviews yet. Tried Riso lungo B integrale rosso ermes? Be the first to share how it tastes.

Write a review

Your rating

Reviews are moderated. See our Privacy Policy.

Compare & rankings

Healthier alternatives

Best in category →

Same category, meaningfully better on at least one measure and no worse on the others. Each card shows what improves.

More rices

View all →