View full-size photo · Photo: Open Food Facts contributors, CC BY-SA
Perles de tapioca
Perles de tapioca by Yao provides 238 kcal per 100 g, with 0 g of sugars and 0 g of protein. That is 100% less sugar than the average product in this category. Its Nutri-Score is C and it is classified as NOVA 4 (ultra-processed food). It is listed in the Tapioca category and comes in a 250 g pack.
Nutrient levels per 100 g
Levels use UK front-of-pack reference thresholds.
Nutrition facts
| Nutrient | Per 100 g | Category avg |
|---|---|---|
| Calories | 238 kcal | 297 −20% |
| Total fat | 0 g | 1.4 −100% |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0.6 −100% |
| Carbohydrates | 58.4 g | 70.1 −17% |
| Total sugars | 0 g | 3 −100% |
| Added sugars | 0 g | 0.4 −100% |
| Protein | 0 g | 0.6 −100% |
| Salt | 0.2 g | 0.6 −63% |
*% Daily Value for 100 g, based on a 2,000-calorie diet (FDA reference values). Category average across 103 Tapioca products on Foodmetria.
Compared with other tapioca
Bar shows the share of products in this category that contain less of the nutrient.
Ingredients
Amidon de tapioca, eau, sel, E1442, colorant caramel, E466, gomme de guar, conservateur (E262, E266), arômes.
Additives 6
Overexposure risk is based on EFSA evaluations as recorded by Open Food Facts.
Product details
- Quantity
- 250 g
- Sold in
- France
- Barcode
- 3760249075319
Prices reported by shoppers
Loading prices…
Frequently asked questions
How many calories are in Perles de tapioca?
Perles de tapioca contains 238 kcal per 100 g.
How much sugar is in Perles de tapioca?
Perles de tapioca has 0 g of sugars per 100 g, which is considered low by UK front-of-pack guidelines.
Is Perles de tapioca healthy?
It has a Nutri-Score of C (A is best, E is worst); it is in NOVA group 4 — ultra-processed food. Scores describe nutritional quality and processing, not suitability for your individual diet.
Source: Open Food Facts (ODbL). Last updated March 17, 2026. Spotted a mistake? Edit this product on Open Food Facts. Not medical advice — always check the package label.
Reviews
Compare & rankings
Healthier alternatives
Best in category →Same category, meaningfully better on at least one measure and no worse on the others. Each card shows what improves.
b NOVA 3 
b NOVA 3 
a NOVA 2 
b NOVA 2 More tapioca
View all →
c NOVA 2 
c NOVA 2 
c NOVA 2 
c NOVA 3 
c NOVA 2 
c NOVA 2 
