Nutrition report ready

Maple leaf farms, fully cooked duck, rotisserie breasts

Calories, Nutri-Score, processing level, additives, ingredients and shopper prices for this Maple Leaf Farms product.

Nutri-Score D NOVA 4

View details

Maple leaf farms, fully cooked duck, rotisserie breasts

by Maple Leaf Farms in Poultries Barcode 0073981326414
Poor nutritional quality
Ultra-processed food

Maple leaf farms, fully cooked duck, rotisserie breasts by Maple Leaf Farms provides 215 kcal per 100 g, with 0.7 g of sugars and 21.5 g of protein. Its Nutri-Score is D and it is classified as NOVA 4 (ultra-processed food). It is listed in the Poultries category. Contains: soybeans.

Nutrient levels per 100 g

Fat
14.1 g · Moderate
Saturated fat
3.7 g · Moderate
Sugars
0.7 g · Low
Salt
1.5 g · Moderate

Levels use UK front-of-pack reference thresholds.

Nutrition facts

Serving size: 1 portion (135 g)

Nutrient Per 100 g Per serving% DV* Category avg
Calories 215 kcal 290 kcal 158 +36%
Total fat 14.1 g 19 g 24% 8.2 +73%
Saturated fat 3.7 g 5 g 25% 2.4 +56%
Carbohydrates 1.5 g 2 g 1% 2.6 −42%
Total sugars 0.7 g 1 g 0.7
Protein 21.5 g 29 g 58% 18.4 +16%
Salt 1.5 g 2 g 0.9 +61%

*% Daily Value for a serving, based on a 2,000-calorie diet (FDA reference values). Category average across 950 Poultries products on Foodmetria.

Serving size from the US product label in USDA FoodData Central, label data from October 2021. Other values: Open Food Facts.

Nutrition claims check

Claims its numbers support

High protein
40% of calories from protein (EU: at least 20% of calories from protein)
Low sugar
0.7 g sugars per 100 g (EU: no more than 5 g per 100 g)

Checked against the per-100 g thresholds of EU Regulation 1924/2006, using the nutrition data above. US labels follow FDA rules, which are mostly based on serving size and can give a different result; FDA has no defined “low sugar” claim.

Compared with other poultries

Calories higher 13%
Sugars higher 32%
Salt higher 20%
Saturated fat higher 21%
Protein top 18%

Bar shows the share of products in this category that contain less of the nutrient.

Ingredients

Boneless duck breast, water, sodium lactate, contains 2% or less of maltodextrin, salt, sodium phosphates, sugar, modified food starch, dehydrated garlic, dehydrated bell peppers, yeast extract, spices, onion powder, lemon juice powder (corn syrup solids, lemon juice solids, lemon oil), natural smoke flavor, beta carotene (vitamin a), spice extractives, citric acid, soybean oil, natural flavor.

Palm oil free
Allergens
Soybeans

Additives 2

Overexposure risk is based on EFSA evaluations as recorded by Open Food Facts.

Product details

Serving size
1 portion (135 g)
Sold in
United States
Barcode
0073981326414

Prices reported by shoppers

Loading prices…

Frequently asked questions

How many calories are in Maple leaf farms, fully cooked duck, rotisserie breasts?

Maple leaf farms, fully cooked duck, rotisserie breasts contains 215 kcal per 100 g and about 290 kcal per serving (1 portion (135 g)).

How much sugar is in Maple leaf farms, fully cooked duck, rotisserie breasts?

Maple leaf farms, fully cooked duck, rotisserie breasts has 0.7 g of sugars per 100 g, which is considered low by UK front-of-pack guidelines.

Is Maple leaf farms, fully cooked duck, rotisserie breasts healthy?

It has a Nutri-Score of D (A is best, E is worst); it is in NOVA group 4 — ultra-processed food. Scores describe nutritional quality and processing, not suitability for your individual diet.

What allergens does Maple leaf farms, fully cooked duck, rotisserie breasts contain?

According to the label data it contains: Soybeans. Recipes change — always check the package label.

Source: Open Food Facts (ODbL). Last updated April 22, 2020. Spotted a mistake? Edit this product on Open Food Facts. Not medical advice — always check the package label.

Reviews

No reviews yet. Tried Maple leaf farms, fully cooked duck, rotisserie breasts? Be the first to share how it tastes.

Write a review

Your rating

Reviews are moderated. See our Privacy Policy.

Compare & rankings

Healthier alternatives

Best in category →

Same category, meaningfully better on at least one measure and no worse on the others. Each card shows what improves.

More poultries

View all →

More from Maple Leaf Farms

View all →