Nutrition report ready

Hamburguesas vacuno

Calories, Nutri-Score, processing level, additives, ingredients and shopper prices for this Eroski product.

Nutri-Score E

View details

Hamburguesas vacuno

by Eroski 4 x 85 g in Meats Barcode 8480010038057
Bad nutritional quality

Hamburguesas vacuno by Eroski provides 240 kcal per 100 g, with 3.5 g of sugars and 12 g of protein. That is 244% more sugar than the average product in this category. Its Nutri-Score is E. It is listed in the Meats category and comes in a 4 x 85 g pack.

Nutrient levels per 100 g

Fat
20 g · High
Saturated fat
7.1 g · High
Sugars
3.5 g · Low
Salt
2.3 g · High

Levels use UK front-of-pack reference thresholds.

Nutrition facts

Nutrient Per 100 g Category avg
Calories 240 kcal 205 +17%
Total fat 20 g 12.9 +55%
Saturated fat 7.1 g 4.8 +47%
Carbohydrates 3.5 g 3.6
Total sugars 3.5 g 1 +244%
Protein 12 g 18.4 −35%
Salt 2.3 g 1.5 +53%

Category average across 3356 Meats products on Foodmetria.

Compared with other meats

Calories higher 29%
Sugars higher 7%
Salt higher 16%
Saturated fat higher 25%
Protein top 88%

Bar shows the share of products in this category that contain less of the nutrient.

Product details

Quantity
4 x 85 g
Labels & certifications
No glutenGreen Dot
Sold in
Spain
Barcode
8480010038057

Prices reported by shoppers

Loading prices…

Frequently asked questions

How many calories are in Hamburguesas vacuno?

Hamburguesas vacuno contains 240 kcal per 100 g.

How much sugar is in Hamburguesas vacuno?

Hamburguesas vacuno has 3.5 g of sugars per 100 g, which is considered low by UK front-of-pack guidelines.

Is Hamburguesas vacuno healthy?

It has a Nutri-Score of E (A is best, E is worst). Scores describe nutritional quality and processing, not suitability for your individual diet.

Source: Open Food Facts (ODbL). Last updated March 27, 2026. Spotted a mistake? Edit this product on Open Food Facts. Not medical advice — always check the package label.

Reviews

No reviews yet. Tried Hamburguesas vacuno? Be the first to share how it tastes.

Write a review

Your rating

Reviews are moderated. See our Privacy Policy.

Compare & rankings

Healthier alternatives

Best in category →

Same category, meaningfully better on at least one measure and no worse on the others. Each card shows what improves.

More meats

View all →

More from Eroski

View all →