Nutrition report ready

Hamburguesa de vacuno

Calories, Nutri-Score, processing level, additives, ingredients and shopper prices for this Eroski product.

Nutri-Score D

View details

Hamburguesa de vacuno

by Eroski in Meats Barcode 8480010071092
Poor nutritional quality

Hamburguesa de vacuno by Eroski provides 224 kcal per 100 g, with 1.2 g of sugars and 15 g of protein. That is 18% more sugar than the average product in this category. Its Nutri-Score is D. It is listed in the Meats category.

Nutrient levels per 100 g

Fat
17 g · Moderate
Saturated fat
5.7 g · High
Sugars
1.2 g · Low
Salt
2.3 g · High

Levels use UK front-of-pack reference thresholds.

Nutrition facts

Nutrient Per 100 g Category avg
Calories 224 kcal 205 +9%
Total fat 17 g 12.9 +32%
Saturated fat 5.7 g 4.8 +18%
Carbohydrates 3 g 3.6 −17%
Total sugars 1.2 g 1 +18%
Protein 15 g 18.4 −18%
Salt 2.3 g 1.5 +53%

Category average across 3358 Meats products on Foodmetria.

Compared with other meats

Calories higher 34%
Sugars higher 22%
Salt higher 16%
Saturated fat higher 33%
Protein top 77%

Bar shows the share of products in this category that contain less of the nutrient.

Product details

Labels & certifications
No gluten
Sold in
Spain
Barcode
8480010071092

Prices reported by shoppers

Loading prices…

Frequently asked questions

How many calories are in Hamburguesa de vacuno?

Hamburguesa de vacuno contains 224 kcal per 100 g.

How much sugar is in Hamburguesa de vacuno?

Hamburguesa de vacuno has 1.2 g of sugars per 100 g, which is considered low by UK front-of-pack guidelines.

Is Hamburguesa de vacuno healthy?

It has a Nutri-Score of D (A is best, E is worst). Scores describe nutritional quality and processing, not suitability for your individual diet.

Source: Open Food Facts (ODbL). Last updated March 27, 2026. Spotted a mistake? Edit this product on Open Food Facts. Not medical advice — always check the package label.

Reviews

No reviews yet. Tried Hamburguesa de vacuno? Be the first to share how it tastes.

Write a review

Your rating

Reviews are moderated. See our Privacy Policy.

Compare & rankings

Healthier alternatives

Best in category →

Same category, meaningfully better on at least one measure and no worse on the others. Each card shows what improves.

More meats

View all →

More from Eroski

View all →