Nutrition report ready

Hack

Calories, Nutri-Score, processing level, additives, ingredients and shopper prices.

Nutri-Score A

View details

Hack

in Meat analogues Barcode 5060626401433
Very good nutritional quality

Hack provides 199 kcal per 100 g, with 0.1 g of sugars and 19.1 g of protein. That is 95% less sugar than the average product in this category. Its Nutri-Score is A. It is listed in the Meat analogues category.

Nutrient levels per 100 g

Fat
10.2 g · Moderate
Saturated fat
3.9 g · Moderate
Sugars
0.1 g · Low
Salt
0.6 g · Moderate

Levels use UK front-of-pack reference thresholds.

Nutrition facts

Nutrient Per 100 g Category avg
Calories 199 kcal 204
Total fat 10.2 g 10
Saturated fat 3.9 g 1.8 +120%
Carbohydrates 7.8 g 11.6 −33%
Total sugars 0.1 g 2.2 −95%
Dietary fiber 4.9 g 4.7 +5%
Protein 19.1 g 15.2 +26%
Salt 0.6 g 1.5 −60%

Category average across 2797 Meat analogues products on Foodmetria.

Compared with other meat analogues

Calories lower 49%
Sugars lower 5%
Salt lower 7%
Saturated fat higher 9%
Protein top 22%
Fiber top 41%

Bar shows the share of products in this category that contain less of the nutrient.

Product details

Sold in
Germany
Barcode
5060626401433

Prices reported by shoppers

Loading prices…

Frequently asked questions

How many calories are in Hack?

Hack contains 199 kcal per 100 g.

How much sugar is in Hack?

Hack has 0.1 g of sugars per 100 g, which is considered low by UK front-of-pack guidelines.

Is Hack healthy?

It has a Nutri-Score of A (A is best, E is worst). Scores describe nutritional quality and processing, not suitability for your individual diet.

Source: Open Food Facts (ODbL). Last updated March 26, 2026. Spotted a mistake? Edit this product on Open Food Facts. Not medical advice — always check the package label.

Reviews

No reviews yet. Tried Hack? Be the first to share how it tastes.

Write a review

Your rating

Reviews are moderated. See our Privacy Policy.

Compare & rankings

Healthier alternatives

Best in category →

Same category, meaningfully better on at least one measure and no worse on the others. Each card shows what improves.

More meat analogues

View all →