View full-size photo · Photo: Open Food Facts contributors, CC BY-SA
Geurige Pandan Rijst
Geurige Pandan Rijst by Sawa provides 352 kcal per 100 g, with 0.5 g of sugars and 7.6 g of protein. That is 37% more sugar than the average product in this category. Its Nutri-Score is B. It is listed in the White rices category and comes in a 1 kg pack.
Nutrient levels per 100 g
Levels use UK front-of-pack reference thresholds.
Nutrition facts
Serving size: 75g
| Nutrient | Per 100 g | Per serving | % DV* | Category avg |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 352 kcal | 264 kcal | 343 | |
| Total fat | 1 g | 0.8 g | 1% | 0.8 +31% |
| Saturated fat | 0.3 g | 0.2 g | 1% | 0.2 +54% |
| Carbohydrates | 77 g | 57.8 g | 21% | 73.3 +5% |
| Total sugars | 0.5 g | 0.4 g | 0.4 +37% | |
| Dietary fiber | 1.1 g | 0.8 g | 3% | 1.3 −18% |
| Protein | 7.6 g | 5.7 g | 11% | 7.1 +6% |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g | 0 −100% |
*% Daily Value for a serving, based on a 2,000-calorie diet (FDA reference values). Category average across 298 White rices products on Foodmetria.
Compared with other white rices
Bar shows the share of products in this category that contain less of the nutrient.
Ingredients
Pandan rijst
- May contain traces
- Gluten
Product details
- Quantity
- 1 kg
- Serving size
- 75g
- Sold in
- Netherlands
- Barcode
- 23075498
Prices reported by shoppers
Loading prices…
Frequently asked questions
How many calories are in Geurige Pandan Rijst?
Geurige Pandan Rijst contains 352 kcal per 100 g and about 264 kcal per serving (75g).
How much sugar is in Geurige Pandan Rijst?
Geurige Pandan Rijst has 0.5 g of sugars per 100 g, which is considered low by UK front-of-pack guidelines.
Is Geurige Pandan Rijst healthy?
It has a Nutri-Score of B (A is best, E is worst). Scores describe nutritional quality and processing, not suitability for your individual diet.
What allergens does Geurige Pandan Rijst contain?
No allergens are listed in the label data. It may also contain traces of gluten. Recipes change — always check the package label.
Source: Open Food Facts (ODbL). Last updated February 11, 2022. Spotted a mistake? Edit this product on Open Food Facts. Not medical advice — always check the package label.
Reviews
Compare & rankings
Healthier alternatives
Best in category →Same category, meaningfully better on at least one measure and no worse on the others. Each card shows what improves.
a NOVA 1 
b 
b 
b More white rices
View all →
b NOVA 1 
b NOVA 1 
b 
b NOVA 1
b 
b NOVA 1 
