View full-size photo · Photo: Open Food Facts contributors, CC BY-SA
Filete de Panga
Filete de Panga by EXKIMO provides 67 kcal per 100 g, with 0 g of sugars and 13.4 g of protein. That is 100% less sugar than the average product in this category. Its Nutri-Score is A and it is classified as NOVA 4 (ultra-processed food). It is listed in the Iridescent shark fillets category and comes in a 480 g pack. Contains: fish.
Nutrient levels per 100 g
Levels use UK front-of-pack reference thresholds.
Nutrition facts
| Nutrient | Per 100 g | Category avg |
|---|---|---|
| Calories | 67 kcal | 88 −24% |
| Total fat | 1.2 g | 3 −60% |
| Saturated fat | 0.5 g | 0.8 −39% |
| Carbohydrates | 0.3 g | 1.3 −76% |
| Total sugars | 0 g | 0.2 −100% |
| Added sugars | 0 g | 0 −100% |
| Protein | 13.4 g | 13.9 |
| Salt | 0.7 g | 0.8 −14% |
*% Daily Value for 100 g, based on a 2,000-calorie diet (FDA reference values). Category average across 57 Iridescent shark fillets products on Foodmetria.
Compared with other iridescent shark fillets
Bar shows the share of products in this category that contain less of the nutrient.
Ingredients
Panga (_pescado_), agua 6%, estabilizadores (E451, E452).
- Allergens
- Fish
Additives 2
Overexposure risk is based on EFSA evaluations as recorded by Open Food Facts.
Product details
- Quantity
- 480 g
- Sold in
- Spain
- Barcode
- 8436553470182
Prices reported by shoppers
Loading prices…
Frequently asked questions
How many calories are in Filete de Panga?
Filete de Panga contains 67 kcal per 100 g.
How much sugar is in Filete de Panga?
Filete de Panga has 0 g of sugars per 100 g, which is considered low by UK front-of-pack guidelines.
Is Filete de Panga healthy?
It has a Nutri-Score of A (A is best, E is worst); it is in NOVA group 4 — ultra-processed food. Scores describe nutritional quality and processing, not suitability for your individual diet.
What allergens does Filete de Panga contain?
According to the label data it contains: Fish. Recipes change — always check the package label.
Source: Open Food Facts (ODbL). Last updated March 27, 2026. Spotted a mistake? Edit this product on Open Food Facts. Not medical advice — always check the package label.
Reviews
Compare & rankings
Healthier alternatives
Best in category →Same category, meaningfully better on at least one measure and no worse on the others. Each card shows what improves.
a NOVA 1 
a NOVA 1 
a NOVA 1 
a NOVA 3 More iridescent shark fillets
View all →
a NOVA 3 
a 
a 
a NOVA 4 
c NOVA 4 More from EXKIMO
View all →
d 
a 
a 
c 
a 
a