View full-size photo · Photo: Open Food Facts contributors, CC BY-SA
Farine de Riz Gluant au Pandan
Farine de Riz Gluant au Pandan by Cock Brand provides 349 kcal per 100 g, with 0 g of sugars and 6.3 g of protein. That is 100% less sugar than the average product in this category. Its Nutri-Score is B and it is classified as NOVA 4 (ultra-processed food). It is listed in the Rice flours category and comes in a 400 g pack.
Nutrient levels per 100 g
Levels use UK front-of-pack reference thresholds.
Nutrition facts
| Nutrient | Per 100 g | Category avg |
|---|---|---|
| Calories | 349 kcal | 353 |
| Total fat | 0 g | 1.6 −100% |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0.4 −100% |
| Carbohydrates | 81 g | 77.1 +5% |
| Total sugars | 0 g | 0.8 −100% |
| Added sugars | 0 g | 0 −100% |
| Dietary fiber | 1 g | 2 −49% |
| Protein | 6.3 g | 7 −10% |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.1 −100% |
*% Daily Value for 100 g, based on a 2,000-calorie diet (FDA reference values). Category average across 227 Rice flours products on Foodmetria.
Compared with other rice flours
Bar shows the share of products in this category that contain less of the nutrient.
Ingredients
Riz gluant 98 %, extrait de pandan 1,99 %, colorants (E102, E133).
Additives 2
Overexposure risk is based on EFSA evaluations as recorded by Open Food Facts.
Product details
- Quantity
- 400 g
- Labels & certifications
- Green Dot
- Sold in
- France
- Barcode
- 0084909005229
Prices reported by shoppers
Loading prices…
Frequently asked questions
How many calories are in Farine de Riz Gluant au Pandan?
Farine de Riz Gluant au Pandan contains 349 kcal per 100 g.
How much sugar is in Farine de Riz Gluant au Pandan?
Farine de Riz Gluant au Pandan has 0 g of sugars per 100 g, which is considered low by UK front-of-pack guidelines.
Is Farine de Riz Gluant au Pandan healthy?
It has a Nutri-Score of B (A is best, E is worst); it is in NOVA group 4 — ultra-processed food. Scores describe nutritional quality and processing, not suitability for your individual diet.
Source: Open Food Facts (ODbL). Last updated March 25, 2026. Spotted a mistake? Edit this product on Open Food Facts. Not medical advice — always check the package label.
Reviews
Compare & rankings
Healthier alternatives
Best in category →Same category, meaningfully better on at least one measure and no worse on the others. Each card shows what improves.
a NOVA 1 
b NOVA 1 
b NOVA 1 
b NOVA 1 More rice flours
View all →
a NOVA 1 
b NOVA 1 
b NOVA 1 
NOVA 1 
b 
a NOVA 1 More from Cock Brand
View all →
NOVA 4 
e NOVA 4 
e NOVA 3 
NOVA 4 
e NOVA 3 
d NOVA 3