Nutrition report ready

Carne picada basic

Calories, Nutri-Score, processing level, additives, ingredients and shopper prices for this Eroski product.

Nutri-Score D

View details

Carne picada basic

by Eroski in Meats Barcode 8480010280753
Poor nutritional quality

Carne picada basic by Eroski provides 232 kcal per 100 g, with 0 g of sugars and 16 g of protein. That is 100% less sugar than the average product in this category. Its Nutri-Score is D. It is listed in the Meats category.

Nutrient levels per 100 g

Fat
18 g · High
Saturated fat
5.9 g · High
Sugars
0 g · Low
Salt
1 g · Moderate

Levels use UK front-of-pack reference thresholds.

Nutrition facts

Nutrient Per 100 g Category avg
Calories 232 kcal 205 +13%
Total fat 18 g 12.9 +40%
Saturated fat 5.9 g 4.8 +22%
Carbohydrates 0 g 3.6 −100%
Total sugars 0 g 1 −100%
Protein 16 g 18.4 −13%
Salt 1 g 1.5 −34%

Category average across 3359 Meats products on Foodmetria.

Compared with other meats

Calories higher 32%
Sugars lower 1%
Salt lower 43%
Saturated fat higher 33%
Protein top 71%

Bar shows the share of products in this category that contain less of the nutrient.

Product details

Labels & certifications
No glutenGreen Dot
Sold in
Spain
Barcode
8480010280753

Prices reported by shoppers

Loading prices…

Frequently asked questions

How many calories are in Carne picada basic?

Carne picada basic contains 232 kcal per 100 g.

How much sugar is in Carne picada basic?

Carne picada basic has 0 g of sugars per 100 g, which is considered low by UK front-of-pack guidelines.

Is Carne picada basic healthy?

It has a Nutri-Score of D (A is best, E is worst). Scores describe nutritional quality and processing, not suitability for your individual diet.

Source: Open Food Facts (ODbL). Last updated March 27, 2026. Spotted a mistake? Edit this product on Open Food Facts. Not medical advice — always check the package label.

Reviews

No reviews yet. Tried Carne picada basic? Be the first to share how it tastes.

Write a review

Your rating

Reviews are moderated. See our Privacy Policy.

Compare & rankings

Healthier alternatives

Best in category →

Same category, meaningfully better on at least one measure and no worse on the others. Each card shows what improves.

More meats

View all →

More from Eroski

View all →