Nutrition report ready

Burger meat vacuno

Calories, Nutri-Score, processing level, additives, ingredients and shopper prices for this Eroski product.

Nutri-Score A

View details

Burger meat vacuno

by Eroski in Meats Barcode 8480010293371
Very good nutritional quality

Burger meat vacuno by Eroski provides 133 kcal per 100 g, with 0.4 g of sugars and 16 g of protein. That is 61% less sugar than the average product in this category. Its Nutri-Score is A. It is listed in the Meats category.

Nutrient levels per 100 g

Fat
5.5 g · Moderate
Saturated fat
2.3 g · Moderate
Sugars
0.4 g · Low
Salt
0.2 g · Low

Levels use UK front-of-pack reference thresholds.

Nutrition facts

Nutrient Per 100 g Category avg
Calories 133 kcal 205 −35%
Total fat 5.5 g 12.9 −57%
Saturated fat 2.3 g 4.8 −52%
Carbohydrates 4.9 g 3.6 +36%
Total sugars 0.4 g 1 −61%
Protein 16 g 18.4 −13%
Salt 0.2 g 1.5 −84%

Category average across 3358 Meats products on Foodmetria.

Compared with other meats

Calories lower 26%
Sugars lower 44%
Salt lower 29%
Saturated fat lower 40%
Protein top 71%

Bar shows the share of products in this category that contain less of the nutrient.

Product details

Labels & certifications
Green Dot
Sold in
Spain
Barcode
8480010293371

Prices reported by shoppers

Loading prices…

Frequently asked questions

How many calories are in Burger meat vacuno?

Burger meat vacuno contains 133 kcal per 100 g.

How much sugar is in Burger meat vacuno?

Burger meat vacuno has 0.4 g of sugars per 100 g, which is considered low by UK front-of-pack guidelines.

Is Burger meat vacuno healthy?

It has a Nutri-Score of A (A is best, E is worst). Scores describe nutritional quality and processing, not suitability for your individual diet.

Source: Open Food Facts (ODbL). Last updated March 27, 2026. Spotted a mistake? Edit this product on Open Food Facts. Not medical advice — always check the package label.

Reviews

No reviews yet. Tried Burger meat vacuno? Be the first to share how it tastes.

Write a review

Your rating

Reviews are moderated. See our Privacy Policy.

Compare & rankings

Healthier alternatives

Best in category →

Same category, meaningfully better on at least one measure and no worse on the others. Each card shows what improves.

More meats

View all →

More from Eroski

View all →