ZERO Secco vs Prosecco
Overall, Prosecco has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | ZERO Secco | Prosecco |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 31 kcal | 0 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 6.6 g | 0 g |
| Salt | — | 0 g |
| Fiber | — | 0 g |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g |
| Additives | 2 | 2 |
| Allergens | Sulphur dioxide and sulphites | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Prosecco has no calories, while ZERO Secco has 31 kcal.
- Prosecco has no sugar, while ZERO Secco has 6.6 g.
- Only ZERO Secco lists: Sulphur dioxide and sulphites.
Ingredients
ZERO Secco
Entalkoholisierter Wein (Trauben, rektifiziertes Traubenmostkonzentrat), Kohlensäure, Konservierungsstoff: E 242, Sulfite
Prosecco
Grapes, Carbon dioxide, Preservative (Potassium metabisulphite)
FAQ
Which is healthier: ZERO Secco or Prosecco?
Overall, Prosecco has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Prosecco has fewer calories: 0 kcal versus 31 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Prosecco has less sugar: 0 g versus 6.6 g per 100 g.