Wraps au blé nature vs Wraps Multigrains
Overall, Wraps Multigrains has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 0.
Wraps au blé nature
Wraps Multigrains
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Wraps au blé nature | Wraps Multigrains |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | a |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 314 kcal | 312 kcal |
| Fat | 7 g | 7 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.8 g | 0.9 g |
| Sugars | 1.1 g | 1 g |
| Salt | 1 g | 0.9 g |
| Fiber | 4.3 g | 6.4 g |
| Protein | 8 g | 7.3 g |
| Additives | 5 | 5 |
| Allergens | Gluten | Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Wraps Multigrains has 33% more fiber (6.4 g vs 4.3 g).
- Wraps Multigrains has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Wraps au blé nature
Farine de FROMENT (57%), eau, stabilisant (glycérine), huile végétale (huile de tournesol) (7%), correcteur d'acidité (acide malique), émulsifiant (mono et diglycérides d'acides gras), farine de FROMENT fermentée, sel, poudre à lever (bicarbonate de sodium), fibres végétales, arôme naturel,
Wraps Multigrains
farine de FROMENT 55%, graines de lin brunes et jaunes [0,9%], graines de mil [0,3%], flocons d'AVOINE 0,3%], flocons de BLÉ [0,3%]), eau, stabilisant (glycérine), huile végétale (huile de tournesol) (7%), correcteur d'acidité (acide malique), émulsifiant (mono - et diglycérides d'acides gras), farine de FROMENT fermentée, sel, poudre à lever (bicarbonate de sodium), fibres végétales, arôme naturel.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Wraps au blé nature or Wraps Multigrains?
Overall, Wraps Multigrains has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Wraps Multigrains has fewer calories: 312 kcal versus 314 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Wraps Multigrains has less sugar: 1 g versus 1.1 g per 100 g.