Comparison

8 Tortillas - Blé nature vs Wraps au blé nature

Overall, Wraps au blé nature has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

Nutrient8 Tortillas - Blé natureWraps au blé nature
Nutri-Score c b
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 299 kcal 314 kcal
Fat 5.2 g 7 g
Saturated fat 1.2 g 0.8 g
Sugars 2.1 g 1.1 g
Salt 1 g 1 g
Fiber 1.6 g 4.3 g
Protein 9.1 g 8 g
Additives55
AllergensGlutenGluten

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • 8 Tortillas - Blé nature has 26% less fat (5.2 g vs 7 g).
  • Wraps au blé nature has 33% less saturated fat (0.8 g vs 1.2 g).
  • Wraps au blé nature has 48% less sugar (1.1 g vs 2.1 g).
  • Wraps au blé nature has 63% more fiber (4.3 g vs 1.6 g).
  • 8 Tortillas - Blé nature has 12% more protein (9.1 g vs 8 g).
  • Wraps au blé nature has the better Nutri-Score.

Ingredients

8 Tortillas - Blé nature

Farine de _blé_, eau, stabilisant (glycérol), huiles végétales (colza, tournesol), émulsifiant (mono - et diglycérides d'acides gras), dextrose, poudres à lever (bicarbonate de sodium, diphosphates), sel de cuisine.

Wraps au blé nature

Farine de FROMENT (57%), eau, stabilisant (glycérine), huile végétale (huile de tournesol) (7%), correcteur d'acidité (acide malique), émulsifiant (mono et diglycérides d'acides gras), farine de FROMENT fermentée, sel, poudre à lever (bicarbonate de sodium), fibres végétales, arôme naturel,

FAQ

Which is healthier: 8 Tortillas - Blé nature or Wraps au blé nature?

Overall, Wraps au blé nature has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

8 Tortillas - Blé nature has fewer calories: 299 kcal versus 314 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Wraps au blé nature has less sugar: 1.1 g versus 2.1 g per 100 g.

More comparisons