Comparison

Witte carnaroli rijst vs Risotto inratable

Overall, Witte carnaroli rijst has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.

Better choice
Witte carnaroli rijst

Witte carnaroli rijst

Priméal · 500 g
b
Risotto inratable

Risotto inratable

Ben's Original · 500 g
b

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientWitte carnaroli rijstRisotto inratable
Nutri-Score b b
NOVA group — —
Calories 350 kcal 150 kcal
Fat 0.6 g 0.5 g
Saturated fat 0.1 g 0.1 g
Sugars 0.3 g 0.5 g
Salt 0.1 g 0 g
Fiber 1.4 g 0.6 g
Protein 7.4 g 3 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Risotto inratable has 57% fewer calories (150 kcal vs 350 kcal).
  • Witte carnaroli rijst has 57% more fiber (1.4 g vs 0.6 g).
  • Witte carnaroli rijst has 59% more protein (7.4 g vs 3 g).

Ingredients

Witte carnaroli rijst

riz carnaroli blanc

Risotto inratable

riz etuvé pour risotto

FAQ

Which is healthier: Witte carnaroli rijst or Risotto inratable?

Overall, Witte carnaroli rijst has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Risotto inratable has fewer calories: 150 kcal versus 350 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Witte carnaroli rijst has less sugar: 0.3 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.

More comparisons

Riz pour risotto vs Risotto inratable Witte carnaroli rijst vs Riz pour risotto Risotto inratable vs Risotto milanese Witte carnaroli rijst vs Risotto milanese Risotto inratable vs Risotto Rice Witte carnaroli rijst vs Risotto Rice Riz spécial Risotto vs Risotto inratable Riz spécial Risotto vs Witte carnaroli rijst