Risotto inratable vs Risotto Rice
Overall, Risotto Rice has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Risotto inratable | Risotto Rice |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | b |
| NOVA group | — | 3 |
| Calories | 150 kcal | 348 kcal |
| Fat | 0.5 g | 1 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 0.3 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 0.2 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 0.6 g | 1 g |
| Protein | 3 g | 6.9 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Risotto inratable has 57% fewer calories (150 kcal vs 348 kcal).
- Risotto inratable has 50% less fat (0.5 g vs 1 g).
- Risotto Rice has 60% less sugar (0.2 g vs 0.5 g).
- Risotto Rice has 40% more fiber (1 g vs 0.6 g).
- Risotto Rice has 57% more protein (6.9 g vs 3 g).
Ingredients
Risotto inratable
riz etuvé pour risotto
Risotto Rice
Arborio Rice
FAQ
Which is healthier: Risotto inratable or Risotto Rice?
Overall, Risotto Rice has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Risotto inratable has fewer calories: 150 kcal versus 348 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Risotto Rice has less sugar: 0.2 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.