Risotto inratable vs Risotto milanese
Overall, Risotto inratable has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Risotto inratable | Risotto milanese |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | c |
| NOVA group | — | 4 |
| Calories | 150 kcal | 110 kcal |
| Fat | 0.5 g | 0.6 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 0.3 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 0.7 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.6 g |
| Fiber | 0.6 g | 0.8 g |
| Protein | 3 g | 2.2 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | Gluten, Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Risotto milanese has 27% fewer calories (110 kcal vs 150 kcal).
- Risotto inratable has 93% less salt (0 g vs 0.6 g).
- Risotto inratable has 27% more protein (3 g vs 2.2 g).
- Risotto inratable has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Risotto milanese lists: Gluten, Milk.
Ingredients
Risotto inratable
riz etuvé pour risotto
Risotto milanese
Riso parboiled 88%, farina di FRUMENTO, sale iodato, LATTOSIO, grasso di palma, cipolla 0,7%, estratto di lievito, FORMAGGIO fuso 0,6%, zucchero, sale, olio extravergine d'oliva, curcuma, zafferano 0,04%, aromi. Può contenere glutine, uova, sedano, senape e soia.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Risotto inratable or Risotto milanese?
Overall, Risotto inratable has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Risotto milanese has fewer calories: 110 kcal versus 150 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Risotto inratable has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 0.7 g per 100 g.