Comparison
Riz pour risotto vs Risotto inratable
Overall, Riz pour risotto has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Riz pour risotto | Risotto inratable |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | b |
| NOVA group | 1 | — |
| Calories | 352 kcal | 150 kcal |
| Fat | 0.9 g | 0.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.2 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 0.2 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 1.1 g | 0.6 g |
| Protein | 7.4 g | 3 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Risotto inratable has 57% fewer calories (150 kcal vs 352 kcal).
- Risotto inratable has 44% less fat (0.5 g vs 0.9 g).
- Riz pour risotto has 60% less sugar (0.2 g vs 0.5 g).
- Riz pour risotto has 45% more fiber (1.1 g vs 0.6 g).
- Riz pour risotto has 59% more protein (7.4 g vs 3 g).
Ingredients
Riz pour risotto
Riz pour risotto
Risotto inratable
riz etuvé pour risotto
FAQ
Which is healthier: Riz pour risotto or Risotto inratable?
Overall, Riz pour risotto has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Risotto inratable has fewer calories: 150 kcal versus 352 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Riz pour risotto has less sugar: 0.2 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.
More comparisons
Witte carnaroli rijst vs Riz pour risotto
Riz pour risotto vs Riz pour Risotto Crémeux...
Riz pour risotto vs Risotto Reis Ribe
Risotto inratable vs Risotto milanese
Risotto inratable vs Risotto Rice
Riz spécial Risotto vs Risotto inratable
Riz pour Risotto Crémeux... vs Risotto inratable
Risotto Reis Ribe vs Risotto inratable