Comparison
Witte carnaroli rijst vs Riz pour risotto
Overall, Witte carnaroli rijst has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 1 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Witte carnaroli rijst | Riz pour risotto |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | b |
| NOVA group | — | 1 |
| Calories | 350 kcal | 352 kcal |
| Fat | 0.6 g | 0.9 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 0.2 g |
| Sugars | 0.3 g | 0.2 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 1.4 g | 1.1 g |
| Protein | 7.4 g | 7.4 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Witte carnaroli rijst has 33% less fat (0.6 g vs 0.9 g).
Ingredients
Witte carnaroli rijst
riz carnaroli blanc
Riz pour risotto
Riz pour risotto
FAQ
Which is healthier: Witte carnaroli rijst or Riz pour risotto?
Overall, Witte carnaroli rijst has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Witte carnaroli rijst has fewer calories: 350 kcal versus 352 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Riz pour risotto has less sugar: 0.2 g versus 0.3 g per 100 g.
More comparisons
Riz pour risotto vs Risotto inratable
Riz pour risotto vs Riz pour Risotto Crémeux...
Riz pour risotto vs Risotto Reis Ribe
Witte carnaroli rijst vs Risotto milanese
Witte carnaroli rijst vs Risotto Rice
Riz spécial Risotto vs Witte carnaroli rijst
Witte carnaroli rijst vs Riz pour Risotto Crémeux...
Witte carnaroli rijst vs Risotto Reis Ribe