Comparison

Wildlachsfilet vs 2 Boneless Salmon Fillets

Overall, Wildlachsfilet has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.

Better choice

Nutrition per 100 g

Nutrient	Wildlachsfilet	2 Boneless Salmon Fillets
Nutri-Score	a	a
NOVA group	—	1
Calories	95 kcal	209 kcal
Fat	1.7 g	12 g
Saturated fat	0.4 g	1.6 g
Sugars	0 g	0 g
Salt	0.3 g	0.1 g
Fiber	—	0 g
Protein	20 g	25.3 g
Additives	0	0
Allergens	None listed	Fish

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

Wildlachsfilet has 55% fewer calories (95 kcal vs 209 kcal).
Wildlachsfilet has 86% less fat (1.7 g vs 12 g).
Wildlachsfilet has 75% less saturated fat (0.4 g vs 1.6 g).
2 Boneless Salmon Fillets has 21% more protein (25.3 g vs 20 g).
Only 2 Boneless Salmon Fillets lists: Fish.

Ingredients

Wildlachsfilet

2 Boneless Salmon Fillets

salmon (fish).

FAQ

Which is healthier: Wildlachsfilet or 2 Boneless Salmon Fillets?

Overall, Wildlachsfilet has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Wildlachsfilet has fewer calories: 95 kcal versus 209 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Wildlachsfilet has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.

More comparisons

Salmon fillet with skin vs 2 Boneless Salmon Fillet... Wildlachsfilet vs Poke salmón Filet de saumon vs Wildlachsfilet Saumon ASC vs 2 Boneless Salmon Fillet... Saumon ASC vs Wildlachsfilet Pavés de saumon Rose du... vs 2 Boneless Salmon Fillet... Pavés de saumon Rose du... vs Wildlachsfilet Purée de pommes de terre... vs 2 Boneless Salmon Fillet...