Comparison

Wild Soul Bar Maní vs Enlínea Barra de Cereal Sin Azúcar

Overall, Enlínea Barra de Cereal Sin Azúcar has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientWild Soul Bar ManíEnlínea Barra de Cereal Sin...
Nutri-Score d b
NOVA group 3 4
Calories 418 kcal 268 kcal
Fat 20.1 g 3.9 g
Saturated fat 3.9 g 0.6 g
Sugars 34 g 0.2 g
Salt 0.2 g 0 g
Fiber 0 g 0 g
Protein 13.5 g 5.4 g
Additives04
AllergensPeanutsSoybeans

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Enlínea Barra de Cereal Sin Azúcar has 36% fewer calories (268 kcal vs 418 kcal).
  • Enlínea Barra de Cereal Sin Azúcar has 81% less fat (3.9 g vs 20.1 g).
  • Enlínea Barra de Cereal Sin Azúcar has 85% less saturated fat (0.6 g vs 3.9 g).
  • Enlínea Barra de Cereal Sin Azúcar has 99% less sugar (0.2 g vs 34 g).
  • Wild Soul Bar Maní has 60% more protein (13.5 g vs 5.4 g).
  • Enlínea Barra de Cereal Sin Azúcar has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Wild Soul Bar Maní is less processed (lower NOVA group).
  • Only Wild Soul Bar Maní lists: Peanuts.
  • Only Enlínea Barra de Cereal Sin Azúcar lists: Soybeans.

Ingredients

Wild Soul Bar Maní

Pasta de dátiles (55%), maní picado (44.9%), sal de mar (0.1%).

Enlínea Barra de Cereal Sin Azúcar

Proteína aislada de soya, sucralosa, cocoa (3.1%), aceite de girasol, stevia (0.1%), lecitina de soya, sal.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Wild Soul Bar Maní or Enlínea Barra de Cereal Sin Azúcar?

Overall, Enlínea Barra de Cereal Sin Azúcar has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Enlínea Barra de Cereal Sin Azúcar has fewer calories: 268 kcal versus 418 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Enlínea Barra de Cereal Sin Azúcar has less sugar: 0.2 g versus 34 g per 100 g.

More comparisons