Wild Blueberry Preserves vs Kirsch-Pfirsich-Maracuja
Overall, Kirsch-Pfirsich-Maracuja has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Wild Blueberry Preserves
Kirsch-Pfirsich-Maracuja
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Wild Blueberry Preserves | Kirsch-Pfirsich-Maracuja |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | d |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 250 kcal | 245 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 65 g | 55 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 0.8 g | — |
| Protein | 0 g | 0.5 g |
| Additives | 1 | 2 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Wild Blueberry Preserves has no fat, while Kirsch-Pfirsich-Maracuja has 0.5 g.
- Kirsch-Pfirsich-Maracuja has 15% less sugar (55 g vs 65 g).
- Kirsch-Pfirsich-Maracuja has 100% more protein (0.5 g vs 0 g).
Ingredients
Wild Blueberry Preserves
Wild-blueberries, sugar, cane sugar, concentrated lemon juice, fruit pectin.
Kirsch-Pfirsich-Maracuja
Sauerkirschen (37%), Zucker, Glukose-Fruktose-Sirup, Pfirsiche (11 %), Maracujas (2 %), Geliermittel: Pektine; Sauerungsmittel: Citronensaure.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Wild Blueberry Preserves or Kirsch-Pfirsich-Maracuja?
Overall, Kirsch-Pfirsich-Maracuja has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Kirsch-Pfirsich-Maracuja has fewer calories: 245 kcal versus 250 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Kirsch-Pfirsich-Maracuja has less sugar: 55 g versus 65 g per 100 g.