Comparison
Wholegrain rice vs Il classico
Overall, Il classico has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Wholegrain rice | Il classico |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | b |
| NOVA group | 3 | — |
| Calories | 164 kcal | 350 kcal |
| Fat | 2.5 g | 1.1 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.5 g | 0.3 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 0.4 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 1.9 g | 2 g |
| Protein | 3.7 g | 7 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Wholegrain rice has 53% fewer calories (164 kcal vs 350 kcal).
- Il classico has 56% less fat (1.1 g vs 2.5 g).
- Il classico has 47% more protein (7 g vs 3.7 g).
Ingredients
Wholegrain rice
Steamed parboiled wholegrain rice (98%), sunflower oil.
Il classico
RISO ROMA PARBOILED
FAQ
Which is healthier: Wholegrain rice or Il classico?
Overall, Il classico has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Wholegrain rice has fewer calories: 164 kcal versus 350 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Il classico has less sugar: 0.4 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.