Comparison

Wafers alla vaniglia vs Poker Vaniglia

Overall, Poker Vaniglia has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientWafers alla vanigliaPoker Vaniglia
Nutri-Score e e
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 520 kcal 525 kcal
Fat 26 g 26.4 g
Saturated fat 25 g 23.9 g
Sugars 38 g 30.4 g
Salt 0.4 g 0 g
Fiber 0 g 3.5 g
Protein 4.8 g 4.2 g
Additives22
AllergensGluten, Milk, Nuts, SoybeansGluten, Milk, Soybeans

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Poker Vaniglia has 20% less sugar (30.4 g vs 38 g).
  • Poker Vaniglia has no salt, while Wafers alla vaniglia has 0.4 g.
  • Poker Vaniglia has 100% more fiber (3.5 g vs 0 g).
  • Wafers alla vaniglia has 12% more protein (4.8 g vs 4.2 g).
  • Only Wafers alla vaniglia lists: Nuts.

Ingredients

Wafers alla vaniglia

Olio di cocco, farina di FRUMENTO, sciroppo di glucosio, zucchero, LATTE scremato in polvere, destrosio, siero di LATTE in polvere, estratto di malto d'ORZO, emulsionante: lecitine di SOIA, agenti lievitanti: carbonati di sodio, difosfati; sale, bacche di vaniglia, aroma naturale di vaniglia, NOCCIOLE. Può contenere tracce di altra FRUTTA A GUSCIO. Conservare in luogo fresco ed asciutto.

Poker Vaniglia

Farina di grano tenero, olio di cocco, zucchero, sciroppo di glucosio, siero di latte in polvere, emulsionanti: lecitina di soia, sale, agenti lievitanti: carbonato acido di sodio, estratto di vaniglia (Bourbon).

FAQ

Which is healthier: Wafers alla vaniglia or Poker Vaniglia?

Overall, Poker Vaniglia has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Wafers alla vaniglia has fewer calories: 520 kcal versus 525 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Poker Vaniglia has less sugar: 30.4 g versus 38 g per 100 g.

More comparisons