Comparison

Wafers alla vaniglia vs Gaufettes vanille

Overall, Gaufettes vanille has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientWafers alla vanigliaGaufettes vanille
Nutri-Score e c
NOVA group 4 —
Calories 520 kcal 431 kcal
Fat 26 g 22 g
Saturated fat 25 g 12 g
Sugars 38 g 0.5 g
Salt 0.4 g 0.2 g
Fiber 0 g 10 g
Protein 4.8 g 3 g
Additives20
AllergensGluten, Milk, Nuts, SoybeansNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Gaufettes vanille has 17% fewer calories (431 kcal vs 520 kcal).
  • Gaufettes vanille has 15% less fat (22 g vs 26 g).
  • Gaufettes vanille has 52% less saturated fat (12 g vs 25 g).
  • Gaufettes vanille has 99% less sugar (0.5 g vs 38 g).
  • Gaufettes vanille has 100% more fiber (10 g vs 0 g).
  • Wafers alla vaniglia has 38% more protein (4.8 g vs 3 g).
  • Gaufettes vanille has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Wafers alla vaniglia lists: Gluten, Milk, Nuts, Soybeans.

Ingredients

Wafers alla vaniglia

Olio di cocco, farina di FRUMENTO, sciroppo di glucosio, zucchero, LATTE scremato in polvere, destrosio, siero di LATTE in polvere, estratto di malto d'ORZO, emulsionante: lecitine di SOIA, agenti lievitanti: carbonati di sodio, difosfati; sale, bacche di vaniglia, aroma naturale di vaniglia, NOCCIOLE. Può contenere tracce di altra FRUTTA A GUSCIO. Conservare in luogo fresco ed asciutto.

Gaufettes vanille

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Wafers alla vaniglia or Gaufettes vanille?

Overall, Gaufettes vanille has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Gaufettes vanille has fewer calories: 431 kcal versus 520 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Gaufettes vanille has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 38 g per 100 g.

More comparisons