Viande hachée pur boeuf, 15% Matières Grasses, Filière vs Naudan jauheliha
Overall, Naudan jauheliha has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 0.
Viande hachée pur boeuf, 15% Matières Grasses, Filière
Naudan jauheliha
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Viande hachée pur boeuf, 15%... | Naudan jauheliha |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | c |
| NOVA group | 1 | 1 |
| Calories | 215 kcal | 170 kcal |
| Fat | 15 g | 10 g |
| Saturated fat | 6.8 g | 4.5 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0.2 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 20 g | 20 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Naudan jauheliha has 21% fewer calories (170 kcal vs 215 kcal).
- Naudan jauheliha has 33% less fat (10 g vs 15 g).
- Naudan jauheliha has 34% less saturated fat (4.5 g vs 6.8 g).
Ingredients
Viande hachée pur boeuf, 15% Matières Grasses, Filière
100% viande bovine
Naudan jauheliha
Naudanliha 100 %.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Viande hachée pur boeuf, 15% Matières Grasses, Filière or Naudan jauheliha?
Overall, Naudan jauheliha has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Naudan jauheliha has fewer calories: 170 kcal versus 215 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Viande hachée pur boeuf, 15% Matières Grasses, Filière has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.