Comparison

Véritable choucroute d'Alsace vs Ekologiczna kapusta kiszona

Overall, Ekologiczna kapusta kiszona has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 9 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientVéritable choucroute d'Alsac...Ekologiczna kapusta kiszona
Nutri-Score d c
NOVA group 4 3
Calories 68 kcal 20 kcal
Fat 4.2 g 0.1 g
Saturated fat 1.1 g 0.1 g
Sugars 4.1 g 0.1 g
Salt 2.2 g 1.8 g
Fiber 0.9 g 2 g
Protein 1.6 g 1.1 g
Additives10
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Ekologiczna kapusta kiszona has 71% fewer calories (20 kcal vs 68 kcal).
  • Ekologiczna kapusta kiszona has 98% less fat (0.1 g vs 4.2 g).
  • Ekologiczna kapusta kiszona has 91% less saturated fat (0.1 g vs 1.1 g).
  • Ekologiczna kapusta kiszona has 98% less sugar (0.1 g vs 4.1 g).
  • Ekologiczna kapusta kiszona has 18% less salt (1.8 g vs 2.2 g).
  • Ekologiczna kapusta kiszona has 55% more fiber (2 g vs 0.9 g).
  • Véritable choucroute d'Alsace has 31% more protein (1.6 g vs 1.1 g).
  • Ekologiczna kapusta kiszona has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Ekologiczna kapusta kiszona is less processed (lower NOVA group).

Ingredients

Véritable choucroute d'Alsace

Choucroute, bouillon (eau, arôme naturel, épices), saindoux (4%), Riesling (2 %), baies de genievre, sel, antioxydant: acide ascorbique.

Ekologiczna kapusta kiszona

Ekologiczna kapusta, sól.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Véritable choucroute d'Alsace or Ekologiczna kapusta kiszona?

Overall, Ekologiczna kapusta kiszona has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Ekologiczna kapusta kiszona has fewer calories: 20 kcal versus 68 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Ekologiczna kapusta kiszona has less sugar: 0.1 g versus 4.1 g per 100 g.

More comparisons