Comparison

Vegetarischer Linsen-Eintopf vs Bio Linseneintopf

Overall, Bio Linseneintopf has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientVegetarischer Linsen-EintopfBio Linseneintopf
Nutri-Score c b
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 69 kcal 64 kcal
Fat 0.9 g 1.1 g
Saturated fat 0.1 g 0.1 g
Sugars 1.5 g 1 g
Salt 1 g 0.9 g
Fiber 1.8 g 3.2 g
Protein 3.6 g 3.2 g
Additives31
AllergensMustardCelery, Gluten

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Bio Linseneintopf has 33% less sugar (1 g vs 1.5 g).
  • Bio Linseneintopf has 44% more fiber (3.2 g vs 1.8 g).
  • Vegetarischer Linsen-Eintopf has 11% more protein (3.6 g vs 3.2 g).
  • Bio Linseneintopf has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Vegetarischer Linsen-Eintopf lists: Mustard.
  • Only Bio Linseneintopf lists: Celery, Gluten.

Ingredients

Vegetarischer Linsen-Eintopf

Wasser, gekochte Linsen 33%, Kartoffeln 7,7%, Möhren 7,0%, modifizierte Stärke, Salz, Senf (Wasser, Senfsaaten, Branntweinessig, Salz, Gewürze), Rapsöl, Tomatenmark, Zucker, Aromen, Hefeextrakt, Wein-Branntweinessig, Petersilie, färbender Paprikaextrakt, Antioxidationsmittel: Ascorbinsäure, Säuerungsmittel: Citronensäure, Raucharoma.

Bio Linseneintopf

Wasser, 30 % Linsen, 11 % Kartoffeln, 7 % Karotten Zwiebeln, Tomatenmark, Meersalz, Sonnenblumenöl, Stärke, Weizenmehl, Verdickungsmittel: Guarkernmehl; Rohrohrzucker, Apfelessig, Gewürze (enthält Sellerie), Kräuter

FAQ

Which is healthier: Vegetarischer Linsen-Eintopf or Bio Linseneintopf?

Overall, Bio Linseneintopf has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Bio Linseneintopf has fewer calories: 64 kcal versus 69 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Bio Linseneintopf has less sugar: 1 g versus 1.5 g per 100 g.

More comparisons