Comparison

Vanilla Chocolate Balls x3 Banana Chocolate Flakes x3 vs Birchermüesli

Overall, Birchermüesli has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientVanilla Chocolate Balls x3 B...Birchermüesli
Nutri-Score c c
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 133 kcal 137 kcal
Fat 3.9 g 5.9 g
Saturated fat 2.4 g 3.1 g
Sugars 16.9 g 13 g
Salt 0 g 0.1 g
Fiber 0 g 0.5 g
Protein 0.2 g 5 g
Additives01
AllergensMilkGluten, Milk, Nuts

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Vanilla Chocolate Balls x3 Banana Chocolate Flakes x3 has 34% less fat (3.9 g vs 5.9 g).
  • Vanilla Chocolate Balls x3 Banana Chocolate Flakes x3 has 23% less saturated fat (2.4 g vs 3.1 g).
  • Birchermüesli has 23% less sugar (13 g vs 16.9 g).
  • Birchermüesli has 100% more fiber (0.5 g vs 0 g).
  • Birchermüesli has 96% more protein (5 g vs 0.2 g).
  • Only Birchermüesli lists: Gluten, Nuts.

Ingredients

Vanilla Chocolate Balls x3 Banana Chocolate Flakes x3

milk, sugar, banana purée, maize flour, milk powder, cocoa butter, cocoa mass, flavorings, glucose syrup

Birchermüesli

yogourt (_lait_, _protéines du lait_), sucre eau, fruits 4,3% (pêche, poire, purée de banane), céréales 2,2% (flocons de blé, flocons d'orge, flocons d'avoine), sirop de glucose, noisette grillée, raisin sultanine, amidon modifié de maïs cireux, jus de citron concentré, arôme.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Vanilla Chocolate Balls x3 Banana Chocolate Flakes x3 or Birchermüesli?

Overall, Birchermüesli has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Vanilla Chocolate Balls x3 Banana Chocolate Flakes x3 has fewer calories: 133 kcal versus 137 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Birchermüesli has less sugar: 13 g versus 16.9 g per 100 g.

More comparisons