Unsmoked British Bacon Medallions vs 14 Smoked Streaky Bacon Rashers
Overall, Unsmoked British Bacon Medallions has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 1.
Unsmoked British Bacon Medallions
14 Smoked Streaky Bacon Rashers
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Unsmoked British Bacon Medal... | 14 Smoked Streaky Bacon Rash... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | e |
| NOVA group | 3 | — |
| Calories | 62 kcal | 157 kcal |
| Fat | 1.6 g | 18 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.6 g | 7 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 0.2 g |
| Salt | 1.1 g | 2.8 g |
| Fiber | 0.5 g | 0.3 g |
| Protein | 11.4 g | 15.1 g |
| Additives | 3 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Unsmoked British Bacon Medallions has 61% fewer calories (62 kcal vs 157 kcal).
- Unsmoked British Bacon Medallions has 91% less fat (1.6 g vs 18 g).
- Unsmoked British Bacon Medallions has 91% less saturated fat (0.6 g vs 7 g).
- Unsmoked British Bacon Medallions has 60% less salt (1.1 g vs 2.8 g).
- 14 Smoked Streaky Bacon Rashers has 25% more protein (15.1 g vs 11.4 g).
- Unsmoked British Bacon Medallions has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Unsmoked British Bacon Medallions
Pork Loin (91%), Water, Salt, Brown Sugar, Preservatives: Sodium Nitrite, Potassium Nitrate; Antioxidant: Sodium Ascorbate.
14 Smoked Streaky Bacon Rashers
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Unsmoked British Bacon Medallions or 14 Smoked Streaky Bacon Rashers?
Overall, Unsmoked British Bacon Medallions has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Unsmoked British Bacon Medallions has fewer calories: 62 kcal versus 157 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
14 Smoked Streaky Bacon Rashers has less sugar: 0.2 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.