Unsmoked Back Bacon Rashers vs Unsmoked Back Bacon
Overall, Unsmoked Back Bacon has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 0.
Unsmoked Back Bacon Rashers
Unsmoked Back Bacon
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Unsmoked Back Bacon Rashers | Unsmoked Back Bacon |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | — | 3 |
| Calories | 263 kcal | 229 kcal |
| Fat | 17.1 g | 14 g |
| Saturated fat | 5.7 g | 5.7 g |
| Sugars | 0.3 g | 0.3 g |
| Salt | 12.9 g | 3.9 g |
| Fiber | — | 0 g |
| Protein | 23.4 g | 25.4 g |
| Additives | 0 | 3 |
| Allergens | None listed | Pork |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Unsmoked Back Bacon has 13% fewer calories (229 kcal vs 263 kcal).
- Unsmoked Back Bacon has 18% less fat (14 g vs 17.1 g).
- Unsmoked Back Bacon has 70% less salt (3.9 g vs 12.9 g).
- Only Unsmoked Back Bacon lists: Pork.
Ingredients
Unsmoked Back Bacon Rashers
Not available.
Unsmoked Back Bacon
PORK (87%), Water, Salt, Antioxidant: Sodium Ascorbate; Preservatives: Potassium Nitrate, Sodium Nitrite.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Unsmoked Back Bacon Rashers or Unsmoked Back Bacon?
Overall, Unsmoked Back Bacon has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Unsmoked Back Bacon has fewer calories: 229 kcal versus 263 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Unsmoked Back Bacon Rashers has less sugar: 0.3 g versus 0.3 g per 100 g.