Back Bacon Rashers vs Unsmoked Back Bacon Rashers
Overall, Unsmoked Back Bacon Rashers has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.
Back Bacon Rashers
Unsmoked Back Bacon Rashers
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Back Bacon Rashers | Unsmoked Back Bacon Rashers |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 3 | — |
| Calories | 303 kcal | 263 kcal |
| Fat | 22.7 g | 17.1 g |
| Saturated fat | 8.8 g | 5.7 g |
| Sugars | 0.3 g | 0.3 g |
| Salt | 3.7 g | 12.9 g |
| Fiber | 0.3 g | — |
| Protein | 24.3 g | 23.4 g |
| Additives | 3 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Unsmoked Back Bacon Rashers has 13% fewer calories (263 kcal vs 303 kcal).
- Unsmoked Back Bacon Rashers has 24% less fat (17.1 g vs 22.7 g).
- Unsmoked Back Bacon Rashers has 35% less saturated fat (5.7 g vs 8.8 g).
- Back Bacon Rashers has 71% less salt (3.7 g vs 12.9 g).
Ingredients
Back Bacon Rashers
British Pork (87%), Water, Salt, Preservatives: Sodium Nitrite, Potassium Nitrate; Antioxidant: Sodium Ascorbate
Unsmoked Back Bacon Rashers
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Back Bacon Rashers or Unsmoked Back Bacon Rashers?
Overall, Unsmoked Back Bacon Rashers has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Unsmoked Back Bacon Rashers has fewer calories: 263 kcal versus 303 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Back Bacon Rashers has less sugar: 0.3 g versus 0.3 g per 100 g.