Comparison

Back Bacon Rashers vs 10 Unsmoked Back Bacon Rashers

Overall, 10 Unsmoked Back Bacon Rashers has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientBack Bacon Rashers10 Unsmoked Back Bacon Rashe...
Nutri-Score e e
NOVA group 3 3
Calories 303 kcal 191 kcal
Fat 22.7 g 13.2 g
Saturated fat 8.8 g 5.2 g
Sugars 0.3 g 0.5 g
Salt 3.7 g 2.4 g
Fiber 0.3 g 0.5 g
Protein 24.3 g 17.4 g
Additives33
AllergensNone listedPork

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • 10 Unsmoked Back Bacon Rashers has 37% fewer calories (191 kcal vs 303 kcal).
  • 10 Unsmoked Back Bacon Rashers has 42% less fat (13.2 g vs 22.7 g).
  • 10 Unsmoked Back Bacon Rashers has 41% less saturated fat (5.2 g vs 8.8 g).
  • 10 Unsmoked Back Bacon Rashers has 34% less salt (2.4 g vs 3.7 g).
  • Back Bacon Rashers has 28% more protein (24.3 g vs 17.4 g).
  • Only 10 Unsmoked Back Bacon Rashers lists: Pork.

Ingredients

Back Bacon Rashers

British Pork (87%), Water, Salt, Preservatives: Sodium Nitrite, Potassium Nitrate; Antioxidant: Sodium Ascorbate

10 Unsmoked Back Bacon Rashers

Pork (87%), Water, Salt, Preservatives (Sodium Nitrite, Potassium Nitrate), Antioxidant (Sodium Ascorbate).

FAQ

Which is healthier: Back Bacon Rashers or 10 Unsmoked Back Bacon Rashers?

Overall, 10 Unsmoked Back Bacon Rashers has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

10 Unsmoked Back Bacon Rashers has fewer calories: 191 kcal versus 303 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Back Bacon Rashers has less sugar: 0.3 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.

More comparisons