Uncured Beef Knockwurst vs Polish Kielbasa
Overall, Polish Kielbasa has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Uncured Beef Knockwurst | Polish Kielbasa |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 274 kcal | 250 kcal |
| Fat | 23.9 g | 19.6 g |
| Saturated fat | 9.7 g | 6.3 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 1.8 g |
| Salt | 2.1 g | 2.4 g |
| Fiber | — | 1.8 g |
| Protein | 13.3 g | 12.5 g |
| Additives | 0 | 1 |
| Allergens | Beef, Celery | Beef |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Polish Kielbasa has 18% less fat (19.6 g vs 23.9 g).
- Polish Kielbasa has 36% less saturated fat (6.3 g vs 9.7 g).
- Uncured Beef Knockwurst has no sugar, while Polish Kielbasa has 1.8 g.
- Only Uncured Beef Knockwurst lists: Celery.
Ingredients
Uncured Beef Knockwurst
BEEF, WATER, LESS THAN 1.5% OF SALT, CULTURED CELERY POWDER, NATURAL FLAVOR, PAPRIKA, SEA SALT. IN A PORK CASING.
Polish Kielbasa
Beef, water, corn syrup, with 2% or less of the following, salt, spices including, paprika, dextrose, flavorings, hardwood smoked sugar, beef stock, hydrolyzed vegetable protein, sodium ethorbate, sodium nitrate
FAQ
Which is healthier: Uncured Beef Knockwurst or Polish Kielbasa?
Overall, Polish Kielbasa has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Polish Kielbasa has fewer calories: 250 kcal versus 274 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Uncured Beef Knockwurst has less sugar: 0 g versus 1.8 g per 100 g.