Polish Kielbasa vs Ćevapčići
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Polish Kielbasa | Ćevapčići |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 250 kcal | 243 kcal |
| Fat | 19.6 g | 18 g |
| Saturated fat | 6.3 g | 8 g |
| Sugars | 1.8 g | 2.5 g |
| Salt | 2.4 g | 2 g |
| Fiber | 1.8 g | — |
| Protein | 12.5 g | 15 g |
| Additives | 1 | 10 |
| Allergens | Beef | Gluten, Blé |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Polish Kielbasa has 22% less saturated fat (6.3 g vs 8 g).
- Polish Kielbasa has 28% less sugar (1.8 g vs 2.5 g).
- Ćevapčići has 16% less salt (2 g vs 2.4 g).
- Ćevapčići has 17% more protein (15 g vs 12.5 g).
- Only Polish Kielbasa lists: Beef.
- Only Ćevapčići lists: Gluten, Blé.
Ingredients
Polish Kielbasa
Beef, water, corn syrup, with 2% or less of the following, salt, spices including, paprika, dextrose, flavorings, hardwood smoked sugar, beef stock, hydrolyzed vegetable protein, sodium ethorbate, sodium nitrate
Ćevapčići
Viande de bœuf 54%, graisse de bœuf, eau, chapelure (farine de blé, levure), sel de cuisine iodé, régulateur d'acidité: carbonate de sodium, acétate de sodium, stabilisants: diphosphate, triphosphate, acidifiant: glucono-delta-lactone, dextrose, exhausteur de goût: glutamate monosodique, antioxydants: acide ascorbique, ascorbate de sodium, extrait d'épice.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Polish Kielbasa or Ćevapčići?
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Ćevapčići has fewer calories: 243 kcal versus 250 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Polish Kielbasa has less sugar: 1.8 g versus 2.5 g per 100 g.