Trix vs Vivo Line 0% Azúcar
Overall, Vivo Line 0% Azúcar has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Trix | Vivo Line 0% Azúcar |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | c |
| NOVA group | 4 | — |
| Calories | 383 kcal | 360 kcal |
| Fat | 5.2 g | 2.8 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 1.3 g |
| Sugars | 28.4 g | 1.7 g |
| Salt | 0.7 g | 0.8 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 4.8 g | 5.8 g |
| Additives | 3 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Vivo Line 0% Azúcar has 46% less fat (2.8 g vs 5.2 g).
- Trix has no saturated fat, while Vivo Line 0% Azúcar has 1.3 g.
- Vivo Line 0% Azúcar has 94% less sugar (1.7 g vs 28.4 g).
- Vivo Line 0% Azúcar has 17% more protein (5.8 g vs 4.8 g).
- Vivo Line 0% Azúcar has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Trix
(con antioxidante: extracto de romero), regulador de acidez (ácido cítrico), vitaminas y minerales (niacina, vitamina B6, ácido fólico, ácido pantoténico, hierro, zinc, calcio, vitamina B2), colorante (FCF, Rojo allura AC)
Vivo Line 0% Azúcar
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Trix or Vivo Line 0% Azúcar?
Overall, Vivo Line 0% Azúcar has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Vivo Line 0% Azúcar has fewer calories: 360 kcal versus 383 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Vivo Line 0% Azúcar has less sugar: 1.7 g versus 28.4 g per 100 g.