Tripes à la provençale vs Callos a la Madrileña
Overall, Tripes à la provençale has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.
Tripes à la provençale
Callos a la Madrileña
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Tripes à la provençale | Callos a la Madrileña |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | b |
| NOVA group | 4 | — |
| Calories | 99 kcal | 138 kcal |
| Fat | 4.1 g | 8.2 g |
| Saturated fat | 2.1 g | 3.2 g |
| Sugars | 0.8 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 1.1 g | 0.9 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 14.7 g | 14.4 g |
| Additives | 3 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Tripes à la provençale has 28% fewer calories (99 kcal vs 138 kcal).
- Tripes à la provençale has 50% less fat (4.1 g vs 8.2 g).
- Tripes à la provençale has 34% less saturated fat (2.1 g vs 3.2 g).
- Callos a la Madrileña has 38% less sugar (0.5 g vs 0.8 g).
Ingredients
Tripes à la provençale
Estomacs et pieds de bœuf (67%), eau, concentré de tomates ratatouille 2% (tomate, eau, courgette, oignons, poivron, aubergine, huile végétale de tournesol, sel, sucre, épaississant: amidon modifié de mais, herbe de Provence, acidifiant: acide citrique), oignons, sel, maltodextrine, piment doux,extrait d'épices et de plantes aromatiques, pulpe d'ail, acidifiant: acide citrique, gélatine bovine, arôme naturel.
Callos a la Madrileña
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Tripes à la provençale or Callos a la Madrileña?
Overall, Tripes à la provençale has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Tripes à la provençale has fewer calories: 99 kcal versus 138 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Callos a la Madrileña has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 0.8 g per 100 g.