Tripes à la mode de Caen vs Callos a la Madrileña
Overall, Tripes à la mode de Caen has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Tripes à la mode de Caen | Callos a la Madrileña |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | b |
| NOVA group | 3 | — |
| Calories | 111 kcal | 138 kcal |
| Fat | 4.2 g | 8.2 g |
| Saturated fat | 2.3 g | 3.2 g |
| Sugars | 0.2 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 1 g | 0.9 g |
| Fiber | 0.6 g | — |
| Protein | 18 g | 14.4 g |
| Additives | 1 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Tripes à la mode de Caen has 20% fewer calories (111 kcal vs 138 kcal).
- Tripes à la mode de Caen has 49% less fat (4.2 g vs 8.2 g).
- Tripes à la mode de Caen has 28% less saturated fat (2.3 g vs 3.2 g).
- Tripes à la mode de Caen has 60% less sugar (0.2 g vs 0.5 g).
- Tripes à la mode de Caen has 20% more protein (18 g vs 14.4 g).
Ingredients
Tripes à la mode de Caen
Estomacs et pieds de bœuf (73%), eau, carotte (3,5%), oignon (1%), vin aromatisé, sel, Calvados (0,4%), acidifiant : acide citrique, extraits naturels d'épices et d'aromates, ail, épice.
Callos a la Madrileña
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Tripes à la mode de Caen or Callos a la Madrileña?
Overall, Tripes à la mode de Caen has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Tripes à la mode de Caen has fewer calories: 111 kcal versus 138 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Tripes à la mode de Caen has less sugar: 0.2 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.