Callos a la Madrileña vs Callos de ternera preparados
Overall, Callos a la Madrileña has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Callos a la Madrileña | Callos de ternera preparados |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | c |
| NOVA group | — | 4 |
| Calories | 138 kcal | 142 kcal |
| Fat | 8.2 g | 8 g |
| Saturated fat | 3.2 g | 2.6 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 0.6 g |
| Salt | 0.9 g | 1.5 g |
| Protein | 14.4 g | 16 g |
| Additives | 0 | 2 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Callos de ternera preparados has 19% less saturated fat (2.6 g vs 3.2 g).
- Callos a la Madrileña has 42% less salt (0.9 g vs 1.5 g).
- Callos a la Madrileña has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Callos a la Madrileña
Not available.
Callos de ternera preparados
Callos, pata y morro de vacuno (48%) (origen U.E.), chorizo 7% (carne de cerdo, grasa dé cerdo, sal, pimentón, dextrosa, ajo, especias y tripa de colágeno), gelatina (corteza de cerdo), jamón 1% y salsa: agua, tomate, sal, aceite de oliva 0,7%, almidón de maíz, cebolla, especias, pimentón, CTO conservadores E-202, E-250, y antioxidante E-301.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Callos a la Madrileña or Callos de ternera preparados?
Overall, Callos a la Madrileña has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Callos a la Madrileña has fewer calories: 138 kcal versus 142 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Callos a la Madrileña has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 0.6 g per 100 g.