Comparison

Trio de riz vs Riz à la Méditerranéenne

Overall, Trio de riz has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientTrio de rizRiz à la Méditerranéenne
Nutri-Score c c
NOVA group 3 4
Calories 174 kcal 164 kcal
Fat 1.6 g 3.3 g
Saturated fat 0.6 g 0.4 g
Sugars 0 g 2.1 g
Salt 0.7 g 0.5 g
Fiber 2.4 g 1.3 g
Protein 3.6 g 3.7 g
Additives01
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Trio de riz has 52% less fat (1.6 g vs 3.3 g).
  • Trio de riz has no sugar, while Riz à la Méditerranéenne has 2.1 g.
  • Trio de riz has 46% more fiber (2.4 g vs 1.3 g).
  • Trio de riz is less processed (lower NOVA group).

Ingredients

Trio de riz

Eau, riz* long blanc étuvé 32,7%, riz* rouge complet précuit 14,5%, riz* noir étuvé précuit 7,3%, huile d'olive* extra vierge, sel de mer. *Ingrédients issus de l'agriculture biologique.

Riz à la Méditerranéenne

Riz long grain étuvé à la vapeur (86%), double concentré de purée de tomates (5,9%), huile de tournesol, poudre de tomates (2,5%), basilic, arôme naturel, sel, sucre, extrait de levure, oignons en poudre, herbes, acidifiant (acide citrique), ail en poudre, épice.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Trio de riz or Riz à la Méditerranéenne?

Overall, Trio de riz has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Riz à la Méditerranéenne has fewer calories: 164 kcal versus 174 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Trio de riz has less sugar: 0 g versus 2.1 g per 100 g.

More comparisons