Traditional Quinoa vs Jasmine rice
Overall, Traditional Quinoa has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 3.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Traditional Quinoa | Jasmine rice |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | b |
| NOVA group | 1 | — |
| Calories | 395 kcal | 356 kcal |
| Fat | 5.6 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 2.2 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 6.7 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 13.3 g | 6.7 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Jasmine rice has 10% fewer calories (356 kcal vs 395 kcal).
- Jasmine rice has no fat, while Traditional Quinoa has 5.6 g.
- Jasmine rice has no sugar, while Traditional Quinoa has 2.2 g.
- Traditional Quinoa has 100% more fiber (6.7 g vs 0 g).
- Traditional Quinoa has 50% more protein (13.3 g vs 6.7 g).
- Traditional Quinoa has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Traditional Quinoa
White Quinoa
Jasmine rice
Organic white jasmine rice
FAQ
Which is healthier: Traditional Quinoa or Jasmine rice?
Overall, Traditional Quinoa has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Jasmine rice has fewer calories: 356 kcal versus 395 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Jasmine rice has less sugar: 0 g versus 2.2 g per 100 g.