Comparison

Short Cut Vermicelli vs Jasmine rice

Overall, Short Cut Vermicelli has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.

Better choice

Nutrition per 100 g

Nutrient	Short Cut Vermicelli	Jasmine rice
Nutri-Score	a	b
NOVA group	—	—
Calories	370 kcal	356 kcal
Fat	1 g	0 g
Saturated fat	0 g	0 g
Sugars	0 g	0 g
Salt	0 g	0 g
Fiber	3 g	0 g
Protein	11 g	6.7 g
Additives	0	0
Allergens	None listed	None listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

Jasmine rice has no fat, while Short Cut Vermicelli has 1 g.
Short Cut Vermicelli has 100% more fiber (3 g vs 0 g).
Short Cut Vermicelli has 39% more protein (11 g vs 6.7 g).
Short Cut Vermicelli has the better Nutri-Score.

Ingredients

Short Cut Vermicelli

DURUM WHEAT SEMOLINA Allergen advice: Contains wheat gluter

Jasmine rice

Organic white jasmine rice

FAQ

Which is healthier: Short Cut Vermicelli or Jasmine rice?

Overall, Short Cut Vermicelli has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Jasmine rice has fewer calories: 356 kcal versus 370 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Short Cut Vermicelli has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.

More comparisons

Short Cut Vermicelli vs Bulgur Mit Nudeln, Ungek... Traditional Quinoa vs Short Cut Vermicelli Glazed Blueberry Donut vs Short Cut Vermicelli Lucky Penne Protein Past... vs Short Cut Vermicelli Organic White Long Grain... vs Short Cut Vermicelli Hot sauce vs Short Cut Vermicelli Jasmine rice vs Bulgur Mit Nudeln, Ungek... Traditional Quinoa vs Jasmine rice