Comparison

Traditional Quinoa vs Short Cut Vermicelli

Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you.

Traditional Quinoa

Traditional Quinoa

Ancient Harvest · 408 g
a NOVA 1
Short Cut Vermicelli

Short Cut Vermicelli

Savorit is sold by Naga · 500 g
a

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientTraditional QuinoaShort Cut Vermicelli
Nutri-Score a a
NOVA group 1 —
Calories 395 kcal 370 kcal
Fat 5.6 g 1 g
Saturated fat 0 g 0 g
Sugars 2.2 g 0 g
Salt 0 g 0 g
Fiber 6.7 g 3 g
Protein 13.3 g 11 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Short Cut Vermicelli has 82% less fat (1 g vs 5.6 g).
  • Short Cut Vermicelli has no sugar, while Traditional Quinoa has 2.2 g.
  • Traditional Quinoa has 55% more fiber (6.7 g vs 3 g).
  • Traditional Quinoa has 17% more protein (13.3 g vs 11 g).

Ingredients

Traditional Quinoa

White Quinoa

Short Cut Vermicelli

DURUM WHEAT SEMOLINA Allergen advice: Contains wheat gluter

FAQ

Which is healthier: Traditional Quinoa or Short Cut Vermicelli?

Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Short Cut Vermicelli has fewer calories: 370 kcal versus 395 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Short Cut Vermicelli has less sugar: 0 g versus 2.2 g per 100 g.

More comparisons

Traditional Quinoa vs Glazed Blueberry Donut Traditional Quinoa vs Organic White Long Grain... Traditional Quinoa vs Hot sauce Traditional Quinoa vs Lucky Penne Protein Past... Short Cut Vermicelli vs Jasmine rice Short Cut Vermicelli vs Bulgur Mit Nudeln, Ungek... Glazed Blueberry Donut vs Short Cut Vermicelli Lucky Penne Protein Past... vs Short Cut Vermicelli