Totas vs Flaming hot nachos
Overall, Flaming hot nachos has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Totas | Flaming hot nachos |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 526 kcal | 557 kcal |
| Fat | 31 g | 30.9 g |
| Saturated fat | 3.6 g | 14 g |
| Sugars | 2 g | 0.1 g |
| Salt | 2 g | 1.8 g |
| Fiber | 2.6 g | — |
| Protein | 5.6 g | 9 g |
| Additives | 5 | 5 |
| Allergens | None listed | Soybeans |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Totas has 74% less saturated fat (3.6 g vs 14 g).
- Flaming hot nachos has 95% less sugar (0.1 g vs 2 g).
- Flaming hot nachos has 38% more protein (9 g vs 5.6 g).
- Only Flaming hot nachos lists: Soybeans.
Ingredients
Totas
pommes de terre, huile de tournesol (31%), arômes (sucre, sel, maltodextrine, exhausteurs de goût (E621, E635), arômes artificiels, persil, colorant (E160c), arôme fumé, édulcorant (E955) et antioxydant (E392).
Flaming hot nachos
CORN (74%), EDIBLE VEGETABLE OIL (PALMOLEIN, RICE BRAN), EDIBLE COMMON SALT, CHILLI POWDER, BLACK SALT, MALTODEXTRIN, DEHYDRATED VEGETABLE POWDER (GARLIC, ONION, LEMON), HYDROLYZED VEGETABLE PROTEIN (SOYA), ACIDITY REGULATOR (INS 330), FLAVOUR ENHANCER (INS 627, INS 631), YEAST EXTRACT, OREGANO, ANTICAKING AGENT (INS 551), NATURAL & NATURE IDENTICAL FLAVOURING SUBSTANCES (CHILLI, LEMON), PAPRIKA EXTRACT (INS 160C).
FAQ
Which is healthier: Totas or Flaming hot nachos?
Overall, Flaming hot nachos has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Totas has fewer calories: 526 kcal versus 557 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Flaming hot nachos has less sugar: 0.1 g versus 2 g per 100 g.