Tomato and mushroom pasta sauce vs Champignons
Overall, Tomato and mushroom pasta sauce has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Tomato and mushroom pasta sa... | Champignons |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | b |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 40 kcal | 52 kcal |
| Fat | 0.5 g | 1.8 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 0.2 g |
| Sugars | 4.5 g | 5.3 g |
| Salt | 0.7 g | 1.3 g |
| Fiber | 1.2 g | 1.5 g |
| Protein | 1.3 g | 1.4 g |
| Additives | 1 | 1 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Tomato and mushroom pasta sauce has 23% fewer calories (40 kcal vs 52 kcal).
- Tomato and mushroom pasta sauce has 72% less fat (0.5 g vs 1.8 g).
- Tomato and mushroom pasta sauce has 15% less sugar (4.5 g vs 5.3 g).
- Tomato and mushroom pasta sauce has 48% less salt (0.7 g vs 1.3 g).
- Champignons has 20% more fiber (1.5 g vs 1.2 g).
Ingredients
Tomato and mushroom pasta sauce
Tomatoes (55%), Water, Mushrooms (11%), Tomato Purée (9%), Modified Maize Starch, Sugar, Onions (1%), Flavouring, Salt, Acidity Regulator: Citric Acid; Basil, Garlic Purée, Oregano, Black Pepper
Champignons
66% tomates en morceaux, 10% double concentré de tomates, 9% champignons de Paris, 6% oignons, 4% carottes, huile de tournesol, sucre, sel, ail, 0,2% cèpes, 0,1% persil, amidon modifié de maïs, arôme naturel de champignons.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Tomato and mushroom pasta sauce or Champignons?
Overall, Tomato and mushroom pasta sauce has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Tomato and mushroom pasta sauce has fewer calories: 40 kcal versus 52 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Tomato and mushroom pasta sauce has less sugar: 4.5 g versus 5.3 g per 100 g.