Tiger Nut Milk vs Bebida de chufa
Overall, Bebida de chufa has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Tiger Nut Milk | Bebida de chufa |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | d |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 82 kcal | 39 kcal |
| Fat | 2.5 g | 2.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.7 g | 0.8 g |
| Sugars | 12 g | 2.1 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 0.5 g | 0.3 g |
| Protein | 0.6 g | 0.6 g |
| Additives | 1 | 2 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Bebida de chufa has 52% fewer calories (39 kcal vs 82 kcal).
- Bebida de chufa has 83% less sugar (2.1 g vs 12 g).
- Bebida de chufa has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Tiger Nut Milk
Ingredientes: Agua, chufas (9%), azúcar, emulgente (E-472c), estabilizantes (gel de celulosa y goma de celulosa) y aroma.
Bebida de chufa
Agua, chufas 14%, emulgente (citroglicéridos), estabilizante (gel de celulosa y goma de celulosa), edulcorantes (sucralosa y acesulfamo K), aromas de limón y canela.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Tiger Nut Milk or Bebida de chufa?
Overall, Bebida de chufa has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Bebida de chufa has fewer calories: 39 kcal versus 82 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Bebida de chufa has less sugar: 2.1 g versus 12 g per 100 g.